Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 2022 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2095688

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Data examining rates of postoperative complications among SARS-CoV-2 positive children are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive status on postoperative respiratory outcomes for children. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included SARS-CoV-2 positive pediatric patients across 20 hospitals who underwent general anesthesia from March to October 2020. The primary outcome was frequency of postoperative respiratory complications, including: high-flow nasal cannula/non invasive ventilation, reintubation, pneumonia, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), and 30-day respiratory-related readmissions or emergency department (ED) visits. Univariate analyses were used to evaluate associations between patient and procedure characteristics and stratified analyses by symptoms were performed examining incidence of complications. RESULTS: Of 266 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, 163 (61.7%) were male, and the median age was 10 years (interquartile range 4-14). The majority of procedures were emergent or urgent (n = 214, 80.5%). The most common procedures were appendectomies (n = 78, 29.3%) and fracture repairs (n = 40,15.0%). 13 patients (4.9%) had preoperative symptoms including cough or dyspnea. 26 patients (9.8%) had postoperative respiratory complications, including 15 requiring high-flow oxygen, 8 with pneumonia, 4 requiring non invasive ventilation, 3 respiratory ED visits, and 2 respiratory readmissions. Respiratory complications were more common among symptomatic patients than asymptomatic patients (30.8% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.01). Higher ASA class and comorbidities were also associated with postoperative respiratory complications. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative respiratory complications are less common in asymptomatic versus symptomatic SARS-COV-2 positive children. Relaxation of COVID-19-related restrictions for time-sensitive, non urgent procedures in selected asymptomatic patients may be reasonably considered. Additionally, further research is needed to evaluate the costs and benefits of routine testing for asymptomatic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Iii, Respiratory complications.

2.
J Surg Res ; 280: 288-295, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2004290

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 spurred an unprecedented transition from in-person to telemedicine visits in March 2020 at our institution for all prenatal counseling sessions. This study aims to explore differences in demographics of expectant mothers evaluated pre- and post-telemedicine implementation and to explore the patient experience with telemedicine. METHODS: A mixed methods study was completed for mothers with a pregnancy complicated by a fetal surgical anomaly who visited a large tertiary fetal center. Using medical records as quantitative data, patient information was collected for all prenatal visits from 3/2019 to 3/2021. The sample was grouped into pre- and post-telemedicine implementation (based on transition date of 3/2020). Univariate analysis was used to compare demographics between the study groups. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted from 8/2021 to 12/2021 to explore patients' experiences. Line-by-line coding and thematic analysis was performed to develop emerging themes. RESULTS: 292 pregnancies were evaluated from 3/2019 to 3/2021 (pre-telemedicine 123, post-telemedicine 169). There was no significant difference in self-reported race (P = 0.28), ethnicity (P = 0.46), or primary language (P = 0.98). In qualitative interviews, patients reported advantages to telemedicine, including the convenience of the modality with the option to conduct their session in familiar settings (e.g., home) and avoid stressors (e.g., travel to the medical center and finding childcare). Some women reported difficulties establishing a physician-patient connection and a preference for in-person consultations. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in patient demographics at our fetal center in the year leading up to, and the time following, a significant transition to telemedicine. However, patients had unique perspectives on the advantages and disadvantages of the telemedicine experience. To ensure patient centered care, these findings suggest patient preference should be considered when scheduling outpatient surgical counseling and visits.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Telemedicina/métodos , Prioridad del Paciente , Consejo , Derivación y Consulta
3.
J Pediatr Surg ; 2022 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1983538

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted timely access to care for children, including patients with appendicitis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on management of appendicitis and patient outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed including 19 children's hospitals from April 2019-October 2020 of children (age≤18 years) diagnosed with appendicitis. Groups were defined by each hospital's city/state stay-at-home orders (SAHO), designating patients as Pre-COVID (Pre-SAHO) or COVID (Post-SAHO). Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were obtained, and univariate and multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of 6,014 patients, 2,413 (40.1%) presented during the COVID-19 pandemic. More patients were managed non-operatively during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the pandemic (147 (6.1%) vs 144 (4.0%), p < 0.001). Despite this change, there was no difference in the proportion of complicated appendicitis between groups (1,247 (34.6%) vs 849 (35.2%), p = 0.12). COVID era non-operative patients received fewer additional procedures, including interventional radiology (IR) drain placements, compared to pre-COVID non-operative patients (29 (19.7%) vs 69 (47.9%), p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, factors associated with increased odds of receiving non-operative management included: increasing duration of symptoms (OR=1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.012), African American race (OR=2.4, 95% CI: 1.3-4.6), and testing positive for COVID-19 (OR=10.8, 95% CI: 5.4-21.6). CONCLUSION: Non-operative management of appendicitis increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, fewer COVID era cases required IR procedures. These changes in the management of pediatric appendicitis during the COVID pandemic demonstrates the potential for future utilization of non-operative management.

4.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 41(8): e321-e323, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1874027

RESUMEN

Although case reports have suggested an association between severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 and appendicitis, we found that the overall incidence of appendicitis was stable throughout the pandemic at our tertiary pediatric hospital. Furthermore, we did not find evidence of CoV2 infection in 9 appendicitis tissues. Therefore, we conclude that severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 infection of the appendix is not a common etiologic cause of pediatric appendicitis.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Apendicitis/complicaciones , Apendicitis/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Niño , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Surgery ; 172(3): 989-996, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1852108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optimal inguinal hernia repair timing remains controversial. It remains unclear how COVID-19 related elective surgery cancellations impacted timing of inguinal hernia repair and whether any delays led to complications. This study aims to determine whether elective surgery cancellations are safe in pediatric inguinal hernia. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study at 14 children's hospitals included patients ≤18 years who underwent inguinal hernia repair between September 13, 2019, through September 13, 2020. Patients were categorized by whether their inguinal hernia repair occurred before or after their hospital's COVID-19 elective surgery cancellation date. Incarceration and emergency department encounters were compared between pre and postcancellation. RESULTS: Of 1,404 patients, 604 (43.0%) underwent inguinal hernia repair during the postcancellation period, 92 (6.6%) experienced incarceration, and 213 (15.2%) had an emergency department encounter. The postcancellation period was not associated with incarceration (odds ratio 1.54; 95% confidence interval 0.88-2.71; P = .13) or emergency department encounters (odds ratio 1.53; 95% confidence interval 0.94-2.48; P = .09) despite longer median times to inguinal hernia repair (precancellation 29 days [interquartile range 13-55 days] versus postcancellation 31 days [interquartile range 14-73 days], P = .01). Infants were more likely to have the emergency department be their index presentation in the postcancellation period (odds ratio 1.69; 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.31; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Overall, COVID-19 elective surgery cancellations do not appear to increase the likelihood of incarceration or emergency department encounters despite delays in inguinal hernia repair, suggesting that cancellations are safe in children with inguinal hernia. Assessment of elective surgery cancellation safety has important implications for health policy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hernia Inguinal , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Hernia Inguinal/complicaciones , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
JAAPA ; 34(10): 43-48, 2021 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1440651

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: SARS-CoV-2 has profoundly affected the way healthcare is delivered and has created significant strain on medical facilities globally. As a result, hospitals have had to continuously adapt in order to provide optimal patient care while minimizing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, particularly in the surgical setting. Texas Children's Hospital developed a set of protocols for surgical screening and clearance of patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. These screening protocols were designed to mitigate the risk of exposing patients and healthcare providers to SARS-CoV-2 and have evolved significantly as a result of the emerging changes in medicine, technology, and governmental regulations. In this article, we share the reasoning behind the development, implementation, and successive modification of our institutional screening protocols.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Niño , Personal de Salud , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Pediatr Surg ; 56(11): 2078-2085, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1051799

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current literature has shown that adult patients with perioperative Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) have increased rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that children with COVID-19 have favorable postoperative outcomes compared to the reported adult experience. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study for children with a confirmed preoperative COVID-19 diagnosis from April 1st, 2020 to August 15th, 2020 at a free-standing children's hospital. Primary outcomes evaluated were postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality within 30 days of operation. Secondary outcomes included hospital resource utilization, hospital length of stay, and postoperative oxygen support. RESULTS: A total of 66 children with preoperative confirmed COVID-19 were evaluated with median age of 9.5 years (interquartile range (IQR) 5-14) with 65% male and 70% Hispanic White. Sixty-five percent of patients had no comorbidities, with abdominal pain identified as the most common preoperative symptom (65%). Twenty-three percent of patients presented with no COVID-19 related symptoms. Eighty-two percent of patients had no preoperative chest imaging and 98% of patients did not receive preoperative oxygen support. General pediatric surgeons performed the majority of procedures (68%) with the most common diagnosis appendicitis (47%). Forty-one percent of patients were discharged the same day as surgery with 9% of patients utilizing postoperative intensive care unit resources and only 5% receiving postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation. Postoperative complications (7%), readmission (6%), and reoperation (6%) were infrequent, with no mortality. CONCLUSION: COVID-19+ children requiring surgery have a favorable postoperative course and short-term outcomes compared to the reported adult experience. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(2): e85-e86, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-915932

RESUMEN

We report an infant with COVID-19 who presented with bloody stools, lethargy and imaging findings significant for pneumatosis intestinalis. The infant was treated with conservative therapy, including resuscitation, bowel rest and intravenous antibiotics, successfully avoiding surgical intervention.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/complicaciones , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19/fisiopatología , COVID-19/terapia , Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/fisiopatología , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/terapia , Heces , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA